AT&T cripples SlingPlayer to give competitive edge to its own product?

Services

We all know that AT&T defended its decision to cripple limit the iPhone SlingPlayer application with claims that such an application “would use large amounts of wireless network capacity” and “could create congestion and potentially prevent other customers from using the network”. The company further elaborated upon its stance by claiming that “applications like this, which redirects a TV signal to a personal computer, are specifically prohibited under our terms of service”. A Gizmodo tipster claims however, that these publicly proclaimed reasons are only half of the story and a more nefarious reason for a WiFi-only SlingPlayer exists. According to the tipster, AT&T is hard at work with a version of its own Slingplayer-like software, codenamed i-Verse. The i-Verse mobile application will reportedly interact with AT&T’s U-Verse television service and allow U-Verse subscribers to stream recorded video from their DVRs to their mobile phones. The i-Verse application was supposedly well-received when demoed last year and AT&T has been working overtime to get it up and running. Yeah, we can understand AT&T being sore that Sling beat them to the punch with its SlingPlayer app for the iPhone, but deliberately crippling a competitor’s application to give preference to its own app? That is a bit over the top and we hope for AT&T’s sake that this tipster is less than accurate in his claims.

Read

53 Comments
  • Martin

    @peestandingup
    The reason Blackberries use less bandwidth than other phones is because all data goes thru RIM servers. RIM servers compress the data, send it to the BB and the BB then decompresses it. My Bold is capable of both HTML and mobile browsing. I think most people are still under the impression that all blackberry’s still display wap pages only. The truth is wap is preffered by the browser, but you can force html, and if wap is unavailable, the browser has no trouble displaying html. My preference is actually wap pages. Less ads, less unnecessary pics. Nothing but the good parts. Even on the iphone with its “great browser and navigation methods” and big screen I still don’t like html pages on a mobile device.

  • John

    Sun Micro vs Microsoft. Don’t these guys have lawyers?

  • http://www.k5live.com Likeabite

    I can’t say I’m surprised…anything with Apple and the iphone has been in the wrong direction these days…not paying developers, banning apps for the dumbest reasons and now this…Monopoly is a beautiful thing.

1 2 3
blog comments powered by Disqus