Nokia's Q109 profits nosedive, future outlook not entirely bleak

News

Nokia released its financials for the first quarter of 2009 this morning and well, it’s hard not to focus on one area in particular: profits. Nokia’s net income in the first quarter of this year rang up at €122 million, down from €1.22 billion in Q1 2008. That’s no typo… Net plummeted 90%. The forecast had been set at €232 million, making the news a bit less shocking as a sharp decline was expected — just not quite this sharp. OPK (Nokia CEO Olli-Pekka Kallasuvo) had this to say:

In what has been an exceptionally tough environment, we continue to invest in a focused manner in consumer Internet services delivered across our broad portfolio of mobile devices. Combined, these solutions will drive our future growth. As an example in Q1, I am especially pleased with the performance of our first mass market touch product, the Nokia 5800 XpressMusic. Together with Comes With Music, it is a great example of Nokia providing solutions that consumers value.

Regarding the health of the overall mobile device market, the inventory already in the sales channels decreased substantially during Q1 due to extensive destocking by operators and distributors. This adversely impacted our sales volumes in the quarter. However, it has also resulted in the demand picture becoming more predictable as we enter the second quarter.

Nokia still managed to push 93.2 million units out the door in Q109, down only 19% year over year, and margins stayed relatively flat which is a positive note. The company retains its plans to shed €700 million in operating expenses in 2010 however, which is another sign that things will likely get worse before they get better. As much as Nokia enjoys its new Internet Company branding, the space to watch is entry-level and mid-level devices as other areas of its business just aren’t bringing home the bacon right now. The Ovi line is good fun and the $700+ Nokia N97 due out soon will be fun to tinker with, but playing catch up with mobile services and peddling ridiculously overpriced handsets aren’t going to right this ship. To highlight this point, Nseries sales dropped to 5 million in Q109 from 8 million units sold in Q408.

The service portfolio is in a good place right now — let’s see how it can be pushed alongside new and exciting entry-level and mid-level handsets. New and exciting, after all, is a good place for Nokia to be. The company today clarified that it has sold 3 million 5800 XpressMusic devices in just one quarter of availability. In other words, its first touchscreen S60 handset which also happens to be quite affordable on contract, is selling like hotcakes.

Read

24 Comments
  • brum

    I just hope Nokia (and BB) can pull a full UI overhaul, likes of iPhone and webOS are really making these platforms look majorly dated…

    Sucks to be a company in this position in this economy, what did RIM get right that Nokia got wrong?

  • JT

    they said so themselves: growth is with touch screens and qwerty devices… 2 areas they barely started in… good luck, they’re gonna need it

  • JP

    Oddly enough, the shares went up to $14++ :-)

  • kiddynamite

    Bleek is not a word.
    Bleak is a word.

    I wouldn’t have mentioned it, but it’s in the post title. RSS readers around the world now believe that you can’t spell.

    Happy birthday, Elements of Style

  • Louis
  • jp

    while they might not be spelling everything correctly, you both are coming on here to read what they have to say. Bgr and its writers are respected, while the two of you can only come on here and try to be assholes.

  • gokmen

    Nokia has a rough road ahead, and the quickest and the most feasible way to get out of it is to acquire RIM,Nokia has a decent market cap(which might be much lower in the future if they don’t take a share of the smartphone market) and a big pile of cash. If they buy RIM they can improve and introduce more models from Blackberry and dominate the smartphone market in India China etc. Where Nokia=Cell phone. They are years behind in smartphone market where the real growth and dollars are. I think it will be good for current blackberry users also.
    Posted from Blackberry Bold on BGR Mobile.

  • Abhishek

    I came off after a 2 year stint with the N95, and loved it when it was released.
    However, since then I tried the Bold, the iPhone 3G, the 5800 and the e71.
    It’s so obvious to prefer the Bold and the iPhone over the other 2 Nokia offerings (for me, at least). Everything from the screen to the usability of the UI, web browsing, everything (except battery life) is better than what Nokia offers.
    Even in markets Nokia dominates, like 3rd party apps – Apple took over and RIM is catching up, CAMERA – other companies are already out with 8mpx camera phones.
    Nokia really need to start concentrating on the bigger, more expensive handsets and re-vamp the UI.

  • ben

    Nokia lost when they said they will no longer develop cdma/evdo phones. Who’s the biggest carrier now in the U.S.? Which is still the dominant standard in Canada and the U.S.? Look at Rim, they are selling top dollar multimode devices (cdma/gsm/evdo/hspa) 8830, Storm and upcoming Niagara.

    Just to prove a point, even with iPhone exclusivity, who is still the biggest carrier? It ain’t AT&T! If iPhone never existed, where would AT&T be now? Your fault Nokia, you dropped the ball on this one when you gave the middle finger to CDMA the dominant and with most subscribers in Canada and the U.S.

    You had it all at one point but you essentially lost the north american market when you went GSM/UTMS/HSPA only.

  • ben

    Now trying with entry level models on Verizon is too little too late. How would your E Series be right now if you had one for Veriz
    on, (Alltel included) U.S. Cellular, Telus, Bell, MTS Mobility, Sasktel Mobility and Aliant?

  • tom

    @Ben

    There are more GSM subscribers than CDMA in Canada. Nevertheless, Nokia hardly bring anything across the pond.

    And Symbian OS, don’t get me started on that.

  • Joseph

    I do not see a single post that seems to have any clue about the #’s or future.

    Nokia and Microsoft are the ONLY 2 companies in the world that have the resources to develop both hardware and software demands of ALL future wireless technologies. RIM and Apple are non-players.

    Nokia has, IS, and WILL dominate market share. You people epitomize what it means to be stupid americans.

  • ben

    There are more cdma in Canada (telus, bell, mts mobility, sasktel mobility and aliant) vs one gsm provider (rogers/fido)

    Rogers/fido doesn’t even come close to all of the cdma providers combined let alone their seamless roaming amongst each other.

  • ben

    Forgot Koodo, Solo and Virgin Mobile to add to the cdma camp. Nevertheless Nokia would have done much better if they didn’t drop cdma in north America

  • Joseph

    We can thank Europe’s leadership for moving world communications forward with GSM. We can thank Nokia for NOT supporting CDMA and ensuring no further delays in the U.S. moving to GSM (LTE).

  • ben

    If your referring to tdma based (old technology) then thank god they didn’t. Cdma based evdo, umts and spa then yes. Ofma based LTE then yes also. Not old useless 2g tdma based
    gsm technology.

  • Joseph

    Correctamundo. If ATT had followed Europe’s GSM standards to begin with, they would be way ahead of Verizon.

    I am glad Verizon is finally listening to Europe and allowing Nokia to play THE leading role in it’s LTE handset deployment.

  • Steve 55

    I agree with Ben in that if Nokia didn’t drop CDMA, then would be at the top of the heap reaping profits year after year like RIM even in today’s tough economy.

    LTE being OFDMA based in an all new technological beast. Verizon as like the other North American CDMA carriers didn’t have to wasted their time and money on building a GSM network from scratch.

    They went (or a currently in development) directly to HSPA (WCDMA based) or LTE (OFDMA based) from CDMA/EVDO

    If Nokia had these chipsets (using both cdma/gsm technology), they would have retained and had access to all of Verizon/Alltel, Sprint, U.S. Cellular, Telus, Bell, MTS Mobility, Sasktel Mobilty, Aliant Mobility, Koodo, Solo and Virgin Mobile customers. But instead just had to settle for AT&T, T-Mobile, Rogers/Fido.

    Now that they’re friends again, (Nokia/Qualcomm) they’re way behind in trying to regain profits and market share in North America.

    The point is, CDMA is still the dominant standard in Canada and the U.S. Ben was right is that Nokia should not have forsaken its huge CDMA/EVDO dominant subscribers in North America

  • Otter

    Yep, i’m with you guys on this one. Nokia shouldn’t have dropped CDMA EVDO. Rim is the perfect example how its number one in profits because it sells GSM/UMTS/HSPA NAmerica and Worldwide plus CDMA/GSM/EVDO/HSPA and soon LTE in single chipset devices.

    That’s what Nokia should have done. Never under estimate the NAmerican Market. Especially when Verizon is in the same sentence.

  • Joseph

    Nokia is at the top of the heap, has been, and will be for at least next 3-5 years.

    You people are just making stuff about RIM. RIM is very tiny, and has very SMALL marketshare (kinda like a MR. Bush’s appendage).

  • jon

    Well if RIM is tiny why did they make over 2 billion just last quarter and Nokia…look at the big company

  • Joseph

    Nokia has more marketshare than RIM and Apple combined. Nokia is the market leader, and is only beginning to establish market presence in the US. Once the US market is captured, Nokia will crush smaller companies like RIM and Apple.

    Again, only Microsoft has anywhere close to the resources and global distribution that can compete with Nokia.

  • John Davidson

    “Nokia is the market leader, and is only beginning to establish market presence in the US. Once the US market is captured, Nokia will crush smaller companies like RIM and Apple.”

    I hate to break it to you but NOKIA did have the marketshare in the U.S. and Canda. Unfortunately, they snobbed the CDMA/EVDO market and lost 90% this last quarter yet RIM beat last years quarter.

    Nokia the apparent market leader only pulled in roughly $1.6 billion this Q1 2009 yet this so called tiny, puny Canadian smartphone maker pulls in $2.24 billion.

    You continue to take losses year after year, quarter after quarter, and you wont be market leader any longer. You’ll be filing for bankruptcy.

    As others have stated, if it just kept with CDMA/EVDO even having multimode single chipsets (CDMA/GSM dual mode) they would be in this position today.

    Now Apple (Next Gen iPhone) is in the talks to incorporate similar chipsets that RIM uses so that it too can sell to Verizon, Telus and other CDMA carriers in North America.

  • M3

    RIM and Nokia have very different business models. RIM only makes money as long as there are companies willing to pay 40-50 bucks just for using their e-mailservers. Nokia is selling mostly cheap phones (with good margins)but they definitely need to improve their smartphone offerings with more appealing models.

blog comments powered by Disqus