Windows market share drops below 90% for the first time in 15 years

News

Microsoft higher-ups might not exactly be shaking in their boots upon hearing this news, but market research firm Net Applications has just released new information that puts the Windows OS market share at its lowest point in 15 years. That low point – 89.62%. Yes, Microsoft still holds the overwhelming lion’s share of the computer OS market and that most definitely won’t be changing any time soon. Since 2004 when Net Applications began OS market share data however, Microsoft’s market share has been steadily declining. Windows reportedly had an astounding 96.4% of the OS market in October of 2004 when Net Applications’ first report on the subject was issued. In other words, Microsoft is losing an average of 1.7% of the market each year, a trend that it certainly hopes to reverse with its recent advertising campaign and eventually with the release of Windows 7. An interesting related note – Vista currently holds approximately 20.45%, up 2.12% over the past three months. Microsoft’s recent ad campaigns have been going strong during that period so this may appear to be a small victory until XP’s market share loss of 2.36% over the same period is considered. As for Microsoft’s largest competitor, Apple’s market share now sits at 8.87% up from 6.80% in November of last year and 3.2% in November of 2004 when the first Net Applications OS report was published.

Read

24 Comments
  • MiniMe

    Apple has done a tremendous job promoting Macs. They took a niche approach, marketing Apple as something really cool. And it worked.

    MS hasn’t done much marketing Vista advantage. It outsourced marketing and costs associated with it to the OEMs, like Dell and HP, to sell their PCs with Windows. I think the numbers shows the pitfall of such approach – despite its superiority Vista is not perceived cool or even good. MS allowed in most cases groundless bad rap to go around, and it tarnished Vista’s image. MS has no one but its corporate strategy to blame.

  • http://www.favbrowser.com Vygantas

    Net Applications shows false data.

    Yes, they addmited that.

  • http://www.k5live.com Likeabite

    Minime I completely agree. Their approach to Vista should’ve been more hands on rather than letting the market promote it. I’m glad there is a growth in Vista though and I guess this is why MACs should see start seeing a steady influx of viruses and malware because of their marketshare. When this happens, look for the dynamics to change again.

  • http://www.sportbikeoasis.com Tom McNicholas

    What if they made Windows 7 free… so that Vista users have something more positive to look forward to?

  • afstech

    Why not show the numbers that they took to produce the results? You also need to remember that 10% market today is like 90% 10 years ago. They should show numbers and not just a percent. You would see that the windows install base is still growing. Market share numbers are just like a poll. It doesn’t really show the whole picture because it does not take every PC into account.

  • ReL

    Take out the US and apple probably has .001% of the market. Can you imagine little villages in 3rd world countries using Macs?

  • Hello World!

    afstech, it is exactly the opposite. Raw numbers hide the true picture and only percentages will allow meaningful comparison.

    Percentage of market share indicates buyer’s preference. If PC had 95% market share it means 95 out of 100 people choose Windows over other OS. If it drops to 89%, then only 89 out of 100 people choose Windows now, indicating that other OS gained strength and began offering something new. Always look at your piece of the pie, that’s how it works in business.

  • http://www.k5live.com Likeabite

    lmao @ ReL…real talk. I don’t see no OneMacPerChild campaigns going around, lol.

  • 1adonis1

    Wow, so MS is still the king,and will be for a long long time.

  • gquaglia

    The same thing happened with IE and Firefox. Slow at first, but little by little Firefox gained. MS should be worried and if their not, then they are as fools.

  • Maliek

    I use Mac’s and PC’s for 3D animation/design. I had a slight problem with Vista at first because it didn’t play nice with networks when I was contracted out to work in-house in someone else’s office. It took about 10 min to upload a PPT file that was less than 1MB to a network drive. It wasn’t fun. I now use that laptop for my home computer and have had no problems with it at all. It’s extremely stable and I can safely say I don’t experience crashes and I do graphics intensive work.

    I agree with those of you that say Microsoft let the media negatively dictate their product and it has had an adverse effect on their sales. Believe me, I like using Mac’s also but mine crashed just like any other computer and my laptop running Vista really doesn’t give me problems at all.

  • Glenn

    I still dont really get why everyone hates vista. I had XP for awhile and didnt really want vista, but the guy i am, I like to try something rather than take someone elses word for it. I really like vista-had my HP laptop since August and so far no problems. No crashes or anything

  • Glenn

    one thing i do disagree on is the way Microsoft handled the whole ordeal.

  • Maliek

    @ Glenn

    As I stated above, I use Mac’s and PC’s. I’m not biased towards either but seeing as I use both, I am amazed everytime I see an “I’m a Mac” commercial and how many times those commercials were lies or a complete exaggeration of the truth and Microsoft just let them get away with it. I guess they underestimated the influence of the media.

  • Orga

    I’m actually glad this is happening. The more market share gets eaten up by other companies (*nix and all its variants has another .00002% out there), the more they’ll have to scratch, claw, fight, and do whatever’s necessary to improve their product.

    All you Mac fanbois can be smarmy cunts, and all you Windows fanbois can list your talking points, but competition is good for everyone.

  • JustMe

    I’m with Glenn. I got a new HP laptop last Dec w/ Vista on it and I love it. Haven’t had a single problem.

  • JJLO

    I have both apple and mac. I was not a fan of xp at all. I do like Vista do not see what all the fuss was about with vista. If there is one complaint is that it takes forever to boot up. I supposed Windows 7 will be even better, especailly if it boots faster. Competition is good. If only gives us better products at better prices over the long run. I will be a user of both operating systems going forward.

  • Evilhomer

    @Orga: You are the only cunt I see here.

  • MaxPayne79

    …on the Revolution my friends!

  • MaxPayne79

    …on with the Revolution my friends!
    Damn it…i gotta learn how to talk about one thing and type another. lol

  • Marco R

    I for one don’t think Microsoft has anything to worry about…
    I had Vista and was happy with it.
    In August I switched to MAC!
    My first iMac had a gradient issue.
    My 2nd and 3rd iMac had burnt pixels out of box.
    My 4th iMac had loud fan humming noises.
    My 5th iMac had a defective Hard Disk.
    I am on my 6th now and the LCD to the left is much brighter than the right side…

    I have told countless people… IF Apple doesn’t get a grip on its quality control… People who switch from Windows to Mac… Will go back to Windows…

    Note… *MAC FANBOIS*…

    Don’t defend there quality control.. You pay 3 to 4x the amount of a PC. I expect an Apple product to be that much better. I never had hardware issues with my $500 Compaq. I have had tons of issues with my $2300 iMac.

    Am I picky? Not at all… I am disgusted with the hardware of Apple…. There customer service is outstanding though.

  • dario9

    Well said Marco R. Same thing goes with the iPhone. I refuse to pay a premium price for poor quality. Sure I could get lucky and not have any issues but between hardware and network performance problems it just isn’t worth the gamble.

    Windows Mobile is far from perfect but my Diamond has never dropped a call and my internet coverage is stellar. HTC makes good phones, sure the move to qualcomm has affected video performance but I can forgive them for that every time I read a post by an iPhone user complaining about their phone experience.

    Quality, quality, quality. Why pay more if you don’t get it? Apple will continue to water down their products unless it starts to affect their bottom line.

  • Marco R

    I dont even want to start about the iPhone… I love it. I hate it.
    I have had light leaks, loose buttons, rough edges, dust under the LCD and vibrator issues…
    The OS 2.0 and 2.01 and 2.02 where horrible.
    2.1 and 2.2 are better…
    That is why I laugh when I hear people bitch about BB Storm… Its there first attempt… After 5 months (Just like the iPhone) it will get better…

    I must say though, I do love the iPhone and hopefully Jobs will get back to Quality. Next time a MAC product comes out… I will think twice. I have told countless people of my story in hopes it gets across… Great designs… Poorly made. Cheaply made nowadays… At a premium price…

    Imagine buying BOSE/BMW and getting problem after problem? If I wanted problems I would have bought a cheap 200$ computer…. LOL

  • Paul

    All the fuss with Vista comes down to:
    1. It had an awesome lot of problems when it launched.
    2. It’s extremely bloated with useless crap and consumes amazing amounts of resources, your computer would run much faster with the same spec and XP.
    3. It has nothing new or novel to offer.

    Of course by now most bugs are fixed, and if you buy a new computer with it you won’t ever see the amount of resources wasted by vista since you don’t have a comparison.

    Simply put vista is an expensive downgrade from XP.

blog comments powered by Disqus