Microsoft fails in blocking Ballmer’s testimony in “Vista Capable” lawsuit

General

Back when Vista was announced, everyone was upset that they’d have to make significant hardware upgrades in order to accommodate the new operating system from Microsoft. Many faithful Windows users had to buy new computers because it was less expensive than making the upgrades necessary to their then-current notebooks and desktops. However, there was a slight problem involved. The original date for the “Vista Capable” campaign was slated for June 1, 2006. For one reason or another, Microsoft decided to launch it three months earlier on April 1. Some of the folks over at Intel were upset because the premature release would not give them enough time to make the chipsets necessary to run properly on Windows Vista. Now it looks as though the two company’s CEOs allegedly had a little agreement of their own – one that would misleadingly label machines with the inadequate Intel chips as “Vista Capable”. Though Microsoft and Intel employees were aware of the situation and were unhappy with it, the issue seemed to be controlled further up the corporate ladder.

Microsoft is now facing charges for misleading consumers and a class-action lawsuit trial is set to begin next April. Steve Ballmer has been assured by Microsoft that he wouldn’t have to be deposed but the judge handling the case thinks otherwise. Ballmer has 30 days to meet with plaintiffs’ lawyers for his deposition and will be forced to testify when the case goes to court. The plaintiffs insist that Ballmer is well aware of what happened with the Vista Capable campaign, even though the Microsoft CEO says, “I was not involved in establishing the requirements computers must satisfy to qualify for the Windows Vista Capable program. I was not involved in formulating any marketing strategy or any public messaging surrounding the Windows Vista Capable program.”

Apple has been gaining a lot of ground on Microsoft and the last thing the makers of Windows need is to further tarnish its reputation by showing how deceitful it had allegedly been to consumers. This possible misplaced effort by Microsoft has been viewed by many as a sign of fear of how Vista might stack up to the Mac OS.

Read

 

 

19 Comments
  • PedroTheGoat

    Neato. I wonder if there ever will be an end to Microsoft. I’m not a big MS hater, but it is kinda nice to see them slipping slightly over the past few years after decades of market supremecy.

    Microsoft has failed to evolve like Google and Apple. Newer thinking companies will be the doom of MS.

  • gquaglia

    M$ deceitful?? No way!

    /sarcasm

    M$ has made their millions off deceit, treachery and underhandedness. Why would this surprise anyone.

  • gquaglia

    Microsoft has failed to evolve like Google and Apple. Newer thinking companies will be the doom of MS.

    Well said. If fact the only thing keeping M$ afloat is their market lock in from years of monopolistic practices. Absent that, M$ would dry up and blow away like some many other companies that sat on their hands while others innovated.

  • b.N

    agreed gquaglia.

    nothing more to add to your post.

  • Paul

    Not to worry according to the “Mayor of the BGR” Mr. Like-To-Spin, says CEOs never lie! HAHAHA

    You may know him as “Likeabite” the guy who attacks anyone on BGR that disagrees with him. He hates all that is Apple, loves all that is Zune, BB, Windows Mobile, and VZW! Oh, don’t dare mention WiFi and VZW in the same sentence.

    He says CEOs never lie and no one should ever listen to a blogger, journalist, or truth teller over a CEO. Users lie, engineers lie, techies lie, but NEVER CEOs. If you believe Like-To-Spin, we can be sure that Mr. Ballmer had absolutely no idea that the Vista sticker program was a sham. It was his staff maybe, and they just NEVER told him! HAHAHA

  • elcubanito

    is time for linux

  • elcubanito

    linux is free and getting better

  • elcubanito

    abajo con windows

  • MiniMe

    MS always amazed me in many ways. Unlike IBM, its not a innovation-adverse monopoly that’s alive purely because of the history (and piles of patents that cover nothing much but common sense and knowledge). It’s not one-trick pony like Google, that never managed to diversified away from its original and only successful product. MS personified true tech power that many feared is going to take over the world.

    They did so in personal PC OS, productivity and other markets. They did so in business OS, servers and other areas. They are the biggest, the best and the most productive in every software they develop. However, they quite miserably failed in net strategy. Given the 100s of millions thrown away in the web area, they simply don’t have a single thinking person at the helm who can organize the business. 10 guys with a million can achieve better results than MS Live with 100Ms in backing. Same goes for consumer area. Zune (and the whole idea of it) is a joke. WM? It killed Palm and it could have been The OS, just like MS on PCs. They let it age, sit idle while competition outran them. Web? IE is the same thing.

    I think that Bill’s strength was in forecasting software needs. He did it perfectly, and MS prospered. Steve might be a shrewd fellow, but he looks insane on every picture. Also, I haven’t seen anything decent that Steve came up with regards to the MS future. Under his command Vista (a great OS, BTW, the most advanced OS on the market) was plagued by delays, received continuous bad rap and less than desired acceptance despite its superior features.

    My two cents? Fire Steve, fire MS Live (and whole internet strategy) senior management, fire consumer branch senior management (WM, Zune guys). None of them added a cent to MS value in recent memory. They all took good ideas and spent billions on losing market share. Spin those divisions as independent startup companies with MS financing. And MS will be a better and stronger company.

  • Da Ereeser

    April 1 to June 1 is 2 months isn’t it?

  • gquaglia

    MS personified true tech power

    You’re not serious? M$ dominated the market with dirty tricks and monopolistic business practices. Their products were neither superior or innovative, they just forced everyone to use them.

  • Malfoy

    Fail to evolve like Apple I can understand. Evolve like google? Google holds whats essentially a monopoly(when ur every purchase has to be taken a look at by every countries trade commission, you’re pretty much a monopoly) on search and paid ads. Most of their products in one way or the other directly makes use of their core product to function and of those products how many have made it big? Gmail and google maps. You can’t count youtube cause they bought them after their video service was weak. Gcheckout (which funny enough doesn’t make use of their core competencies) has failed to give paypal the run they were hoping for.

    Google’s business works because they placed themselves as gatekeepers in a time that everyone/everything is trying to find everyone/everything else. This model will continue to work for a very long time until the day comes that eveyone knows where everything else is in which case Google might become irrelevant.

    Disclaimer: I love google’s search. The rest of their products have yet to woo me.

  • Jimmy Top

    Only idiots spent money to upgrade their hardware just to run Vista. The rest of us stayed with XP. No hardware upgrades necessary.

  • CDMAUser

    I’m still upset that Intel and Microsoft screwed everyone with the 915 chipset and did not pursue the drivers needed for Aero. The card met every specification for this functionality and it turned into a big finger pointing game. I said screw it, dropped my XPS M140 for a XPS M1210 after complaining for two months. I hope the both get slapped with a nice lawsuit. When Vista droped the 915 chipset was still being sold mainstream and the fact that Aero actually worked in builds prior to RTM really upset me. I find it really funny that Beryl/Compiz could do even more visual effects than Aero and didn’t need any new hardware. Punks….

  • keymaker

    Now why the heck would they stick a (Vista Ready ) sticker if they knew all along it wasn’t, Only the geniuses at microsoft would thought of that, same freggin thing with the Xbox 360 and they are so bright that they’re still shipping units that they know that are ether broken or gonna fail within a few months, sometimes weeks, boy they sure have some loyal fanboys

  • DANGERFIELD NEWBY

    Vista was a dog from day one. Microsoft tried to force it down our throats knowing it was a piece of crap. MS needs to just keep supporting XP until ready to release the real upgrade.

  • RVB

    Guys.. really obvious Photoshop work on the photograph :-) But an interesting article!

  • CDMAUser

    Windows ME Second Edition :)

    I look forward to Seven. Hopefully they’ll start sending out Beta invited soon. Already received the Azure invite and a service code so hopefully that’s a good sign.

  • maxPayne79

    Nice picture of buddy. “oh look, here comes the ice cream truck. yeeeey.” lol

blog comments powered by Disqus