Europeans lower roaming charges, by legislation

General

Here in the United States, there are not legal limits on what carriers can charge for roaming, and things can get pretty pricey if you’re on a regional plan (which most people are not). This gets to be more of a problem if you’re a social butterfly on a continent with a lot of small, densely clustered countries. Last year, the European Union introduced caps on what European carriers are allowed to charge customers who roam in the EU. The current limit is 49 euro cents per minute for outgoing calls (about 72 cents US) and is being reduced to 46 euro cents (about 67 cents US). Incoming calls currently may be billed at up to 24 euro cents (about 35 cents US) and will be dropped to 22 euro cents (about 32 cents US). Rejoice, as these limits go in to effect this Sunday, August 31. Further, the European Commission wants the EU to impose a cap on SMS roaming of about 11 to 15 euro cents (16 to 22 cents US). While the economic consequences of price ceilings are something better understood by, well, an economist, we do applaud lower tariffs (didn’t you know that you’re supposed to italicize foreign expressions?).

All of the above prices, of course, exclude European VAT (Value Added Tax), so quadruple them for a more accurate figure.

Read

6 Comments
  • http://blog.ferro.eu.org Nuno da Costa Ferro

    Actually the highest VAT doesn’t reach 25%, so you should be saying: “All of the above prices, of course, exclude European VAT (Value Added Tax), so add a quarter to them for a more accurate figure.”

    But in many countries the VAT is below 19%.

  • Jimmy Grunko

    Let’s think about this logically… There are two effects whenever price caps are introduced: the product/service becomes more in demand, and the provider has less profit from that activity. So either company profits decrease, which shareholders don’t like, or (more likely) other charges increase to compensate for the loss. Assuming that the company doesn’t just hoard all of its money under its bed, some group in the general public will lose out. Maybe the companies will get a bigger tax break? (Taxpayer subsidy) Maybe local rates will go up by a hair? (General consumer subsidy) Maybe they’ll just pay out less in dividends? (Shareholder subsidy) In any event, someone always pays when prices are shifted around.

    Usually there’s also a disincentive for the company to put money into the division whose prices are capped (and cut back on production in that area), but because of the setup of the situation here, I don’t think that’s relevant.
    J

  • http://www.bgr.com Sam Dweck

    I knew that some whippersnapper was going to correct me on VAT. Chill. I am WELL aware that there is no such thing as a 400% VAT.

  • Galvatron

    the Eu is trying to put telcos in check. I.m amadzed they havn’t resorted to Nathionalization of the telcos which woulld be even worse Socalism dosn not work. chamces are uro telcoes will rais rates somwere els an pas that cost on tho the consumer.

    I’d say ther arn’t enough carriers ine each other densly poulated countries. you see 1-2 max im nost uropean countries as a result you have cellco duoopoly. wich is almost as bad as a monopoly. What the EU needs to do is intrduce more competition. that an ease up on the legeslation it cost lots of money to run a socialist police state and security is only temporary.

    in the UK the legislature spends more time trying to figure out how to becom more of a big brother police state than taking care of it’s economy camera’s everywere in london (even restrooms) not just puting you fingerprints in a dbase but your DNA beofr your arested. yet they are still nt saf from terisom or crime you have more robberys an property theft

    while their public sector has grown their private saector has shrunk. an they financials are nosdiving

    and iflation is bad as well they are paying about the equivqlant of $12. a gallon for gas

  • Galvatron

    damn my e key is sticking again

  • trip

    Funny that everybody sees this as a negative thing. I think it’s pretty reasonable, that you don’t get a 400€ phone bill just because you visited Spain and happened to make a few calls. And to be honest, those maximum prices are not in any means cheap, so the carriers won’t be suffering.

blog comments powered by Disqus